a lovely cider , better than the quite frighting (quite lighting) but my main tipple is this and frosty jacks ,,,i love the bottle of scrumpy than the drink lol
chive
Comment 811
a lovely cider , better than the quite frighting (quite lighting) but my main tipple is this and frosty jacks ,,,i love the bottle of scrumpy than the drink lol
just had 2 bottles 4ltre nice but a feel fine just maybe tipsy first drink a thought not nice but it grows on you ..very nice definitely recomend
Thanks.
There seems to be a markup typo because one of your bash examples starts with class equals bash (I'm using words to avoid my text being treated as markup).
What I've actually come here looking for is a way of interactive replaying sequence of command lines. I search for a command (^R), execute it (ENTER), and then want to access the next command in the history.
The comic you credit to justinsomnia is a variant of an XKCD comic. It might be nice to give credit to XKCD too.
It's high-time these companies released details of ingredients used in there products; as SPAR now do with their own brand cider.
Nothing worse than,after reading about how great their orchards are,to find out Kingston Press use artificial sweeteners etc.; just like Magners.
I hope this is not the case.
setting "browser.newtabpage.enabled" to "false" also works. My version of Firefox didn't have "browser.newtab.url" so I tried the above. It would be interesting to know what made Mozilla think this was a good thing when there has been so much negative comment. /Marcis
It is puzzling why the two statements below are both true. String.proto === String.constructor.proto; // true String.proto.constructor === String.constructor; // true
Consider the code below:
String.proto; // function () { [native code] } and String.proto.constructor; // function Function() { [native code] }
whereas :
String.constructor; // function Function() { [native code] } and String.constructor.proto; // function () { [native code] }
I can maybe see why the constructor of the String prototype resembles the Function object; but I don’t see why the prototype of the String constructor is the String prototype.
But here is the really weird part:
String.constructor; //function Function() { [native code] } String.proto.constructor; // function Function() { [native code] } Function; // function Function() { [native code] }
String.proto.constructor === String.constructor; // true String.proto.constructor === Function; // true
So, it would seem that the below would be true; but it turns out to be false String.contructor === Function // false
That makes no logical sense to me. That appears utterly contradictory: If A = B, and B = C, then by the transitive property of algebra, A = C. Right ? The string objects prototype constructor equals the string object’s constructor; the String object’s prototype’s constructor equals the Function object; but the String object’s constructor does not equal the Function object !
Having read your amusing westons cloudy scrumpy review I decided to check out your take on old Rosie! Definitely stronger than it seems a bit like arm wrestling with my wife who is from yorkshire,I'm a pint into a flagon of old Rosie whilst watching the Wimbledon quarter finals and it hits the spot perfectly on a sunny English afternoon.
ok my super short comment was: first line: Perfect, second line: Clear, thrid: Thanks ! And i finished the comment with: Now i know :-)
Is there any easy way to track the number of ads blocked?
what happened to old fashioned values of good food to accompany this fine drink....?